12/04/2003 Karen Hill forwarded
to Barbara A. Ritz, Senior Operations Advisor responded
she is researching whether the change can be done as
part of the processing of the refund rather than a change
in forms. 12/23/2003 Received response from Tom L. Allen
promised by 1/7/2004 Pamela J. Walker, Chief, IMF Branch
sent a position paper to Ruth Jeansonne 1/12/2004, Sottile
asked Jeansonne to confirm if this would be the final
response. The position paper addresses the barriers
IRS has in implementing the change including computer
programming changes, form changes, and that it is currently
an open issue with the Treasury Inspector General for
Tax Administration. (TIGTA). The TIGTA audit addresses
the risks associated when IRS employees have access
to direct deposit account information.
W&I Submission Processing endorsed the proposal
but noted that implementation will require a coordinated
effort within several different IRS organizations and
consideration of the risks associated when IRS employees
have access to direct deposit account information.
On February 23, 2004, TAP received a response from
Wage and Investment, Submissions Processing (also attached)
endorsing the proposal, noting it would alleviate taxpayer
burden and provide a faster means for taxpayers to receive
their refunds. The response also observed that implementation
of the recommendation would require several different
organizations within the IRS to coordinate efforts and
that it “may be feasible and more cost effective
to provide business requirements for direct deposit
on Forms 1040X as part of a Modernization project rather
than make substantial changes to the current processing
environment.” Therefore, we are re-directing our
recommendation to you with the request that you undertake
it as a Modernization project. |