12/04/2003 Karen Hill
forwarded to Barbara A. Ritz, Senior Operations Advisor
responded she is researching whether the change can
be done as part of the processing of the refund rather
than a change in forms. 12/23/2003 Received response
from Tom L. Allen promised by 1/7/2004 Pamela J. Walker,
Chief, IMF Branch sent a position paper to Ruth Jeansonne
1/12/2004, Sottile asked Jeansonne to confirm if this
would be the final response. The position paper addresses
the barriers IRS has in implementing the change including
computer programming changes, form changes, and that
it is currently an open issue with the Treasury Inspector
General for Tax Administration. (TIGTA). The TIGTA audit
addresses the risks associated when IRS employees have
access to direct deposit account information.
W&I Submission Processing endorsed the proposal
but noted that implementation will require a coordinated
effort within several different IRS organizations and
consideration of the risks associated when IRS employees
have access to direct deposit account information.
On February 23, 2004, TAP received a response from
Wage and Investment, Submissions Processing (also attached)
endorsing the proposal, noting it would alleviate taxpayer
burden and provide a faster means for taxpayers to receive
their refunds. The response also observed that implementation
of the recommendation would require several different
organizations within the IRS to coordinate efforts and
that it “may be feasible and more cost effective
to provide business requirements for direct deposit
on Forms 1040X as part of a Modernization project rather
than make substantial changes to the current processing
environment.” Therefore, we are re-directing our
recommendation to you with the request that you undertake
it as a Modernization project. |